Griffinger, Newark, argued the cause for respondents Steven E. Levison, New York City, argued the cause for respondents Lawrence R. Stricklin (Sherman, Silverstein, Kohl, Rose & Podolsky, attorneys, Pennsauken Mr. Rifkin, a member of the Pennsylvania, Paoli, PA and New Jersey bars, argued the cause for appellant G.E. Harold Datz Pension and Profit Sharing Plan (Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrmann & Knopf, attorneys, Saddle Brook Ms. *297 *298 *299 *300 Ruthann Gordon, a member of the Pennsylvania bar, Philadelphia, PA, argued the cause for appellants Dr. Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated, Nominal Defendant-Respondent. Stricklin derivatively in her capacity as a shareholder, Plaintiff-Appellant,Į. Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated by G.E. Gail Dorff, derivatively on behalf of and for the benefit of Public Service Enterprise Group, Incorporated and Public Service Electric & Gas Company, Plaintiff, Harold Datz Pension and Profit Sharing Plan, Plaintiff-Appellant, Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated and Public Service Electric & Gas Company, Nominal Defendants-Respondents.Ī. Hagan and Stanley LaBruna, Defendants-Respondents, Profit Sharing Plan, derivatively on behalf of and for the benefit of Public Service Enterprise Group, Incorporated and Public Service Electric & Gas Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants, 258 In re PSE & G SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION.ĭr.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |